RAZ0RPRISM
All collisions
Frontier Brief · Collision 2026

Algorithm×Nanotechnology

53.5Collision Index
2.9%historical odds of first co-publication

This pair ranks in the top 0.1% of every collision candidate in the corpus. Across held-out years, pairs scoring that well went on to co-publish at 10.0× the base rate, typically within 2 years.

How this was measured →
Frontier Brief

The Frontier Brief for this collision is still being written. The evidence below already reflects the current model run.

Players in this space · predicted

Pre-company space. No named players have staked this collision yet — an emerging pairing where the field, not a firm, is the story so far.

Who actually spans both fields · graph-verified

45 researchers publish on both sides of this collision without the fields themselves having met. Every name below is counted from papers in the corpus — not inferred.

ResearcherAlgorithm / Nanotechnology
  • J. Joshua YangTorrington Hospital
    26
  • Qiangfei XiaPolitecnico di Milano
    17
  • Julia MahamidUniversity of Warsaw
    15
  • Hao JiangNational Institute of Standards and Technology
    15
  • Sjors H. W. ScheresNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
    14
  • Miao HuTexas A&M University
    22
  • John Paul StrachanStanford University
    22
  • Ning GeTexas A&M University
    22
  • R. Stanley WilliamsLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    22
  • Can LiUniversity of Pittsburgh
    13
Institutionpapers each side
  • Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUS
    16378
  • Stanford UniversityUS
    16360
  • Harvard UniversityUS
    15352
  • Chinese Academy of SciencesCN
    9524
  • University of California, BerkeleyUS
    15184
  • Tsinghua UniversityCN
    7353
Closest work to the seambridge fields touched

Counted from the corpus. Institution counts use best-effort affiliation (every author on a paper is paired with every institution on it), so read them as presence, not headcount.

Deep-Dive

A premium Deep-Dive is being generated for this collision — check back soon.