Algorithm×Nanotechnology
This pair ranks in the top 0.1% of every collision candidate in the corpus. Across held-out years, pairs scoring that well went on to co-publish at 10.0× the base rate, typically within 2 years.
The Frontier Brief for this collision is still being written. The evidence below already reflects the current model run.
Pre-company space. No named players have staked this collision yet — an emerging pairing where the field, not a firm, is the story so far.
45 researchers publish on both sides of this collision without the fields themselves having met. Every name below is counted from papers in the corpus — not inferred.
- J. Joshua YangTorrington Hospital2/6
- Qiangfei XiaPolitecnico di Milano1/7
- Julia MahamidUniversity of Warsaw1/5
- Hao JiangNational Institute of Standards and Technology1/5
- Sjors H. W. ScheresNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre1/4
- Miao HuTexas A&M University2/2
- John Paul StrachanStanford University2/2
- Ning GeTexas A&M University2/2
- R. Stanley WilliamsLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory2/2
- Can LiUniversity of Pittsburgh1/3
- Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUS16/378
- Stanford UniversityUS16/360
- Harvard UniversityUS15/352
- Chinese Academy of SciencesCN9/524
- University of California, BerkeleyUS15/184
- Tsinghua UniversityCN7/353
- Polymer informatics: Integrating data‐driven strategies, advanced machine learning, and automated synthesis for next‐generation polymer design2026 · 1 citations · DOI ↗1
- Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning2020 · 3,583 citations · DOI ↗3
- Mime: Mimicking Centralized Stochastic Algorithms in Federated Learning2020 · 94 citations · DOI ↗3
- Faster Adaptive Federated Learning2023 · 86 citations · DOI ↗3
Counted from the corpus. Institution counts use best-effort affiliation (every author on a paper is paired with every institution on it), so read them as presence, not headcount.
A premium Deep-Dive is being generated for this collision — check back soon.